mercoledì 2 maggio 2012

Dr Karyoo adfirms that he discovered the cause of Morgellons disease

Dr Karjoo claims that his studies show a link between Morgellons and silicone silica. He does not quote Geoengineering, but we know that chemtrails compounds contain the material (especially nanomaterials) found by Dr Karyoo too.

According to a recent press release from the Morgellons Medical Center, Dr Rahim Karjoo claims that his research has revealed a connection between the the Morgellons skin phenomenon and the toxicity of silicone silica. Dr Karjoo began his work in the 1990s when he was examining hundreds of cases where patients that had received silicone breast implants suffered from a skin condition that Dr. Karjoo termed “Karjoo’s Phenomenon”.(1) Three week’s after patients had the silicone implants removed, their skin condition healed and the “Karjoo Phenomenon” disappeared for good.Rahim Karjoo has been the Director/Pathologist of Doctors Hospital of West Covina, CA and the American Medical Diagnostic Labs. Karjoo has also taught at the University of Southern California, the University of Connecticut Medical School, Pahlavi University School of Medicine in Iran, and was a member of the Clinical Pathology Teaching Staff at Yale University. According to the press release, Karjoo is in the process of publishing his findings in both medical and environmental journals.

How Morgellons disease began

In the summer of 2001, Mary Leitao became concerned when her 3 year old son’s skin near his lips became irritated. He pointed to his skin and said the one word he knew to describe what it felt like, “bugs.” While rubbing the lotion that the doctor had prescribed for scabies onto the boy’s skin, she felt odd fibers that were emerging from the boy’s skin. As a biologist by career, the mother was both alarmed and intrigued. She removed the filaments and examined them under a microscope, but they looked like nothing at all she had ever looked at under the scope. The fact that she had worked as a medical researcher for five years made that even more surprising. The fibers, according to Leitao, were either red, black or blue and would fluoresce under certain lights. After verifying that the fibers were really coming from her son’s skin and not some external source, she continued her research on the fibers in a real biology lab. However, most answers came from the Internet, where Leitao discovered that the fibers were only the first symptom of the illness – other sufferers reported that later would come neurological issues. (3) By 2006, her son Drew started to experience the neurological effects of the disease. Her husband passed away in 2004 of cardiac arrhythmia, leaving Mary alone to raise the family while battling the mysterious disease.

Today, in 2012, the Morgellons Research Foundation that she founded is no longer active, and the C.D.C.'s conclusion about Morgellons is that it is an “unexplained dermopathy”, not caused by infection or parasites. According to the Mayo Clinic:

“C.D.C. experts note that the signs and symptoms of Morgellons disease are very similar to those of a mental illness involving false beliefs about infestation by parasites (delusional parasitosis).” (2) The stance of the C.D.C .and mainstream science is a bit absurd, with the admission that the symptoms of Morgellons includes “fibers, threads or black stringy material in and on the skin”, yet still referring to the disease as likely being psychological in nature – as though patients can will strange, black fibers to grow from their skin.

Dr Frank Vasey published an article stating that silica "debris" from breast implants can cause "silicone related disorders" (6)

Toxicity of Silicone Silica

Dr Rahim Karjoo references his work and observation of the skin condition in reaction to the toxicity of silicone silica, as a solution to the Morgellons mystery. Karjoo says that the term “Morgellons” is a misnomer for the disease, and would like to officially rename it to Skin Phenomenon of Granulomatous Dermatoses. After observing the condition in silicone breast implant patients, and then learning about sufferers of “Morgellons Disease” in subsequent years, Karjoo founded the Morgellons Medical Center, where Karjoo claims that he has successfully treated numerous Morgellons sufferers.

On his site, Karjoo writes:

“Contamination of the toxic materials released in the environment and also those put in the food and used inside the human body as well as those to be used on the skin surface. I will only explore one of them and that is silica, which is Silicone dioxide. Those governmental agencies should prohibit the use of these products and inform the public regarding the possible side effects, such as the awful disease they call ‘Morgellons’.”

As evidence, Karjoo has publicly published the images and analysis that he has performed on case studies where he has discovered silica particles, and other nanoparticle contaminants as well.

In "Case 3″, Karjoo explains, “shows silicone, silica particles (nanoparticles) are seen on skin surface of most morgellons disease cases.

”In a few cases, Karjoo discovered other nanoparticles, such as polyurethane.

Karjoo writes, “Image 4 Case 4 shows superficial invasion of polyurethane nanoparticles on the skin.

”While it may be easy for skeptics to brush aside Dr. Karjoo’s claims that toxic nanoparticles are to blame for Morgellons Disease, there are actually some preliminary findings in other medical circles that could support Karjoo’s claim.

Nanoparticles in the environment

According to an article published in the Journal of Nanobiotechnology in 2004 titled “Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks”, Oleg Salata of the University of Oxford contends that while nano-science is seeing “massive investment” worldwide, nanoparticles are making their way into a greater number of consumer products.Salata writes that the “potential effects of their widespread use in the consumer and industrial products are just beginning to emerge.”The article dives into some of the potential effects that those nanoparticles could potentially have on human health. Such nanoparticles are now used in all kinds of everyday products, including “sunscreens, toothpastes, sanitary ware coatings and even food products.” (4)

The most alarming part of the paper is the revelation that nanoparticles used in skin cream medications or in sunscreen may ultimately end up infiltrating into the very deep parts of hair follicles.“TiO2 particles are often used in sunscreens to absorb UV light and therefore to protect skin against sunburn or genetic damage. It has been reported by Lademann et al in [82] that micrometer-sized particles of TiO2 get through the human stratum corneum and even into some hair follicles – including their deeper parts.”If Dr Karjoo observed that patients with silicone implants experienced a similar skin condition that cleared up after the implants were removed, it could indicate that silica nanoparticles, as well as other nanoparticles, could offer an important clue to understanding and solving the mysterious illness known today as Morgellons disease.


References & image credits:
(1) PR Newswire
(2) Mayo Clinic
(3) Post Gazette
(4) Journal of Nanobiotechnology – Introduction
(5) Journal of Nanobiotechnology – Section 5 (Skin)
(6) NY Journal of Style and Medicine

Source: topsecretwriters

martedì 1 maggio 2012

Too much scientific reasearch (and even GM reaserch) on plants who resist to aluminium toxicity: wonder why!

Arabidopsis
You can read below a long list of researches on plant and aluminium. Many of them focuses on aluminium resistance mechanisms, some of them are researches on Genetically Modified plants. Many of these researches focuses on crop plants, actually the most important food for the human race .


Please do note this coincidence (and tell all your friends!) coincidenza: a growing number of people campaign against the presence in the sky of planes that leave behind strange trails, and analysis of rainwater shows abnormal and huge levels of aluminium and barium. Recently a renowned doctor and university professor renounced that these planes are litterally poisoning the whole planet causing a huge growth of neurological diseases.

You can read data of italian health department ("Le demenze costituiscono sempre di più un problema rilevante di sanità pubblica, tali patologie rappresentano infatti una delle maggiori cause di disabilità nella popolazione generale ed hanno un considerevole impatto socio-sanitario." that means more or less "dementias are an important and growing problem and a grat cost for the state").



If this spraying is really going on then it is easily explained these huge amount of scientific reaserch on plants and aluminium, the research for kind of plants that can resist to aluminiu toxicity, the creation of Gentecially Modified plants designed to resist to aluminium. It would be very difficult to understand why they are doing all these reaserches if chemtrails should not exist. Well, take a look at the sky, every ten minutes, and you'll see how  most "nuages" you see in the sky are indeed plane trails.
Read this list, you'll be astonished.



Different mechanisms of four aluminum (Al)-resistant transgenes for Al toxicity in Arabidopsis 

Arabidopsis Thaliana, first plant genome sequenced (the link iss from European Community, who funded the genome sequenciation together with U.S and Japonese agencies). Arabidopsis is not for human food but is an easy model to study.

Indeed (as they say): "The Arabidopsis genome underwent a likely complete duplication approximately 110 million years ago. Genome duplication has played a large role in shaping the genomes of crop plants, and the analysis of the Arabidopsis sequence now provides major opportunities to understand chromosome behaviour and how evolution deals with duplicated genes".
They study Arabidopsis to further understand how to modify crop plants?

 And then the other reasearches, the titles are very clear:

Induction of vacuolar ATPase and mitochondrial ATP synthase by aluminum in an aluminum-resistant cultivar of wheat:

Expression of aluminum-induced genes in transgenic arabidopsis plants can ameliorate aluminum stress and/or oxidative stress

Overexpression of an auxilin-like gene (F9E10.5) can suppress Al uptake in roots of Arabidopsis
 
Multiple Aluminum-Resistance Mechanisms in Wheat.

Identification of aluminium-responsive genes in rice cultivars with different aluminium sensitivities

Isolation and characterization of a rice mutant hypersensitive to Al


Engineering greater aluminium resistance in wheat by over-expressing TaALMT1.

Transcriptomic analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to aluminium in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237115 

Aluminum stress response in rice: effects on membrane lipid composition and expression of lipid biosynthesis genes.

A second mechanism for aluminum resistance in wheat relies on the constitutive efflux of citrate from roots.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19005085 

Spatial aluminium sensitivity of root apices of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes with contrasting aluminium resistance.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17975208 

Transcriptomic analysis reveals differential gene expression in response to aluminium in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) genotypes.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20237115 

An ALMT1 gene cluster controlling aluminum tolerance at the Alt4 locus of rye (Secale cereale L).

 Citrate secretion coupled with the modulation of soybean root tip under aluminum stress. Up-regulation of transcription, translation, and threonine-oriented phosphorylation of plasma membrane H+-ATPase.


Analysis of TaALMT1 traces the transmission of aluminum resistance in cultivated common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).
Plant physiological and molecular biological mechanism in response to aluminium toxicity

Molecular mapping of a gene responsible for Al-activated secretion of citrate in barley.

Genes involved in novel adaptive aluminum resistance in Rhodotorula glutinis.

Aluminum stress response in rice: effects on membrane lipid composition and expression of lipid biosynthesis genes.

The crucial role of mitochondrial regulation in adaptive aluminium resistance in Rhodotorula glutinis.

Comparative proteome analysis of differentially expressed proteins induced by Al toxicity in soybean.

An aluminum-activated citrate transporter in barley.
Cytotoxic thio-malate is transported by both an aluminum-responsive malate efflux pathway in wheat and the MAE1 malate permease in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

London 2012 false flag terroristic attack to put the blame on islamic people?

I hope it will not be, but let us watch these videos, expecially the first; in effect there are "one eyed" mascotte, london 2012 logo that looks like the "ZION" word, "illuminati card" that maybe depicts the falling of London Big Ben, 5 men dressed in a way to represent the olimpic circles (5 different colours for their dresses, exactly the same colours of the five rings).



More about the logo.



Well, i repeat, I hope it will not be, and I think that there are hidden powers more powerful than zionism behind zionism itself, but let us watch even this last video. Then you are free to believe or not believe; me, I doubt of everything, but I keep in mind all the warnings.

martedì 24 aprile 2012

Living on fruit - Freelee



Freelee discusses living on fruit and what this has done for her life. She overcame numerous health issues: acne, depression and systemic candida as well as attaining her perfect body weight and amazing fitness levels. We are thrilled to present this wonderful contribution to the Living On Fruit Video Series (http://www.loving-it-raw.com/fruit-nutrition-facts.html)

giovedì 15 marzo 2012

Sucrolose may be harmful just like aspartame?

dolcificante.jpgIs it really true that new sweetener Sucralose by Johnson & Johnson (commercial name SPLENDA) is safe enough to be added to human food? Well, italian vegan site Veganlink tell us that 12.800 animals died during the experimentation of this product. That sounds very alarming to me. 

Johnson & Johnson bought 211 internet domains like Splendakills.com, Spendapoison.com, Splendavictims.com to try to prevent the diffusion of negative information on Sucralose.

Sucralose is chemically derived form saccarose by substitution of 3 idrossilic groups with atoms of Chlore.

More over:

Sucralose, a new noncaloric sweetener, has become extremely popular. However, it is not without problems. In fact, according to an Associated Press report, "While packages of the artificial sweetener Splenda claim, "made from sugar, so it tastes like sugar", one competitor argues that this statement is nothing short of false advertising. In fact, this rival, the Equal manufacturer Merisant Co., has filed a lawsuit against Splenda stating the advertisement should read something a little more like, "made of dextrose, maltodextrin and 4-chloro-4-deoxy-alpha, D-Galactopyranosyl-I, 1,6-dichloro - 1,6-dideoxy-beta, D-fructofuranosidem (Caruso 2,004).
To keep things simple, remember that fake foodstuffs are not food, and that the
body doesnlt like being fooled.
(Caruso, D. B. 2004. Maker of Equal Sues Marketer of Splenda. Associated Press, December 1.)

The website Splendaexposed explicity suggest us that this new sort of "artificial sugar" is just like as the new aspartame; it seems that the same story is repeating again.

In effect the sucralose web site there is a page (http://www.sucralose-org.co.uk/myths/default.asp) stating sucralose is safe, and using as source an article http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/artificial-sweeteners in which aspartame is considered safe. Well, we have a website payed for by the corporation, and a  governative website that states sucralose is safe just like aspartame. Who knows the thruth about aspartame will find it hard to believe that they really tell the thruth.


And now read the article at the following link http://www.splendaexposed.com/articles/2009/01/new_splenda_suc.html and make your own choice.

I already made mine and i tell you to be careful: I found sucrolose it in an homeopathic  medicine!

martedì 13 marzo 2012

Vermont towns reject smart meters: Bennington, Dorset, Manchester, and Sandgate 
vote against rollout in landslide

Curiously enough ..."Echelon"!

Contact
Jesse Mayhew, Campaign Manager
Phone: 802-779-0500
Email: info(_AT_)wakeupoptout.org

During Town Meeting Day, March 6, 2012 four Vermont towns expressed their concerns about the pending rollout by voting against smart meter implementation in their respective communities. The towns of Bennington, Manchester, Dorset, and Sandgate all overwhelmingly chose to reject smart meter rollouts. Although the votes were nonbinding, their outcome is the latest sign Vermonters are becoming increasingly concerned about the impacts smart meters have on their health, privacy, and security.

“These results come from communities where the roll-out has already begun or is set to begin soon. We are not surprised by these results because it is clear that as Vermonters learn more about wireless smart meters, the less they want them in their community.” Said Wake Up Opt Out Campaign Manager Jesse Mayhew.

Manchester resident and Wake Up Opt Out campaign member Tina Victor said there were three main reasons why residents voted against the meters, “Vermonters are voting against smart meters because they are concerned about their privacy, worried about health implications, and think the whole process has been rushed without enough public input or awareness.”

Victor continued, “It is our hope that these votes and recent public opposition to smart meters is enough to get our elected officials and regulators to stop listening to the utilities and start listening to the people’s concerns.”

The Wake Up Opt Out Campaign said the votes were the latest evidence that this is a growing and important issue for Vermonters, “We’ve seen the traffic to our website grow everyday since its launch. We’ve seen the number of letters to the editor in local papers swell. And now we see four towns directly express their concern. It’s very clear this is becoming a much larger issue, and is likely just the beginning of Vermonters speaking out.”

Mayhew continued, “It is also worth pointing out that no towns that discussed smart meters voted in their favor.”

Summary of Results:

• Bennington – Voice Vote for “One year moratorium on installation of smart meters” – broad support with only a “few nays” reported.

• Dorset – Australian ballot to “oppose installation of wireless smart meters” – 292 in favor, 197 against.

• Manchester – Floor vote to “Oppose the installation of wireless smart meters” – 94 in favor, 48 against.

• Sandgate – Floor vote to have Select Board write letter of opposition – 54 in favor, 0 against (unanimous)

Mayhew encourages concerned Vermonters seeking further information on Smart Meters to visit the campaign’s website at www.wakeupoptout.org.